ArticleJournal of rehabilitation2024
Intersectional Employment Disparities Across Disability Status, Race/Ethnicity, LGBTQIA+ Status, Poverty Status, and Geographical Locale During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A National Analysis of Self-Employment Among People with Disabilities Across Demographic and Geographic Factors.Journal of rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) not only exacerbated existing disparities in employment, but also exposed various challenges faced by people with disabilities whose identities intersected with other underserved populations (i.e., race/ethnicity, LGBTQIA+ status, poverty status, geography). The purpose of this scoping review was to map the available academic and popular literature published between 2020 and 2022 to better understand employment experiences among multiply marginalized individuals with disabilities during the pandemic. Seventeen studies covering these individuals and employment content were reviewed. Several themes emerged from the analysis including (a) barriers to employment, (b) disparate employment experiences, (c) exacerbation of economic disparities, and (d) marginalization of people with disabilities from employment science and literature. We recommend that vocational rehabilitation service providers engage in continuous educational opportunities that strengthen their understanding of intersectionality and impacts that multiple social identities may have on employment. Additional research is warranted to provide more detailed information about intersectional employment experiences and disparities post-COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42238849PMC13227571What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.