Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238801›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of high performance computing applications2025

Simulation-based machine learning for real-time assessment of side-branch hemodynamics in coronary bifurcation lesions.

Arash Ghorbannia, Cyrus Tanade, Ayman Yousef, Nusrat Sadia Khan, Madhurima Vardhan, Jocelyn T Chi, Sayan Roychowdhury, Arpita Das, Jane A Leopold, Eric C Chi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of high performance computing applications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arash GhorbanniaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Cyrus TanadeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Ayman YousefDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Nusrat Sadia KhanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Madhurima VardhanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4019-7832
Jocelyn T ChiDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA.
Sayan RoychowdhuryDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Arpita DasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jane A LeopoldDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Eric C ChiDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houtson, TX, USA.
Amanda RandlesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6318-3885

Funding

Data-Driven Approaches to Identify Biomarkers for Guiding Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesion Interventions from Patient-Specific Hemodynamic ModelsR21HL157856 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI RANDLES, AMANDA E · 2022 to 2023
$445k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL157856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provisional stenting is the standard treatment for coronary bifurcation lesions, relying on real-time assessment of side-branch (SB) hemodynamics to guide intervention. Functional metrics such as fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) are used for this purpose. Still, their application in bifurcation lesions is limited by procedural complexity and the lack of preoperative planning tools. We developed a simulation-based machine learning (ML) framework to predict iFR under resting, and FFR under hyperemic conditions. The framework leveraged a synthetic hemodynamic dataset of 252 bifurcation lesions generated from 7 patient-specific geometries using HARVEY, a massively parallel computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver. Anatomical variability was incorporated using four linear mixed-effects (LME) models to establish robust predictions. Two clinically relevant data-splitting strategies were evaluated: (1) a scenario excluding untreated cases, simulating models blind to new geometries, and (2) a scenario incorporating matched untreated cases, reflecting real-world conditions where preoperative anatomical data is available. Morphological features, including lesion severity, length, and curvature, were systematically varied alongside inherited anatomical parameters like bifurcation angle and side-branch count. Splitting approach 2 demonstrated superior predictive performance, achieving a maximum diagnostic accuracy of 0.847 (AUC: 0.899) for FFR and 0.797 (AUC: 0.874) for iFR. Mixed-effects models effectively account for patient-specific anatomical variability, with Bland-Altman analyzes confirming minimal bias between CFD and ML predictions. Incorporating preoperative anatomical information reduced variability and improved diagnostic accuracy across the studied thresholds. The proposed ML framework offers precise, real-time functional assessments of SB hemodynamics, reducing procedural uncertainty in provisional stenting strategies using only pre-operative lesion-specific features and a precomputed synthetic hemodynamic dataset of 252 bifurcation lesion instances. Using synthetic data sets and patient-specific anatomical insights, this approach paves the way for personalized coronary intervention planning, bridging the gap between computational modeling and clinical applicability.

Indexed as

Computational fluid dynamicslinear mixed effect modelspercutaneous coronary interventionprovisional planningsynthetic hemodynamic dataset

Identifiers

PMID42238801
PMCPMC13229539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.