ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Understanding antibiotic decision-making for bovine respiratory disease: a survey of UK farm veterinarians.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of Antibiotic-Tolerant Persister Cells inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in young calves and a major driver of antibiotic use in the United Kingdom (UK), making veterinary decision-making central to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Methods: This study used a mixed-methods survey of UK farm veterinarians ( Results: For BRD diagnosis in calves, clinical examination (36.8%), necropsy (33.7%), and rectal temperature (31.6%) were the tools most regarded as extremely important. Oxytetracycline was the most commonly used primary antibiotic (52.6%), tulathromycin was the secondary option (38.9%), and NSAIDs were represented as the most common ancillary therapy (80.0%). The risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR; 22.1%) and clinical experience (21.1%) primarily drove antibiotic selection. Prevention focused on colostrum management (80.0%), ventilation (65.3%), intranasal vaccines (46.3%), and injectable vaccines (40.0%). Influences on prescribing behaviours included motivations regarding responsible antibiotic use (68.4%), avoiding blame (45.3%), and veterinarian-farmer relationships (42.1%). Bacterial culture and sensitivity testing were the least important (24.2%), suggesting a need to strengthen AMS. Discussion: These results showed a phenomenon in clinical diagnosis, specific antimicrobial classes used, and relational factors in prescribing. The study showed that clinical assessment, social pressures, and policy contexts jointly shaped antimicrobial prescribing decisions. Enhancing diagnostic capacity, embedding evidence-based preventive measures, and applying behavioural frameworks to support veterinarian-farmer communication were identified as essential to improve AMS. The targeted interventions within One Health approach are required to support sustainable UK dairy health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.