ArticlePublic health weekly report2026
Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Coronary Angiography and Interventional Procedures.
Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for coronary angiography (CAG) and interventional procedures in the Republic of Korea (ROK), providing objective standards to optimize patient radiation exposure. Methods: Data were collected from the second through the fourth quarter of 2024 from 20 certified medical institutions. A total of 1,980 cases involving seven major procedures-including CAG, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and chronic total occlusion (CTO) procedure were analyzed. Using digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) radiation dose structured reports (RDSRs) and procedure reports, the dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were evaluated. The DRLs were defined as the 75th percentile of the dose distributions. Results: CTO showed highest values with a DAP of 106.83 Gy‧cm Conclusions: This study presents the first national DRLs for cardiac interventional procedures in the ROK based on multicenter clinical data. These findings provide a foundational baseline for the management of radiation safety and dose optimization in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.