ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2024
Biomechanical modeling and imaging for knee osteoarthritis - is there a role for AI?
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in the biomechanics of knee osteoarthritis: biomechanical phenotyping, risk stratification, diagnosis, treatment and clinical translation-a narrative review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Predicting Knee Osteoarthritis Severity from Radiographic Predictors: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Editorial for the Special -Issue on Biomechanics and Imaging.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
- Etodolac utility in osteoarthritis: drug delivery challenges, topical nanotherapeutic strategies and potential synergies.Therapeutic delivery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This mini review aims to assess the latest advancements in the field of osteoarthritis (OA) research, particularly focusing on the early detection and prediction of disease progression through the use of advanced imaging technologies utilizing biomechanical modeling and artificial intelligence (AI). Design: The review consolidates and discusses findings from studies that utilize biomechanical modeling and/or machine learning algorithms to identify pathological changes in joint tissues indicative of OA or prediction of disease progression. It also briefly reviews future research and how these methods could be used as a part of OA management. Results: AI algorithms have proven highly effective in recognizing the subtle changes in joint tissues associated with OA and in identifying patients at high risk for the disease. While these automated tools facilitate early diagnosis, they typically do not provide personalized intervention strategies to prevent disease progression. AI-enhanced biomechanical modeling has the potential to simulate the effects of various conservative interventions (e.g., weight management, optimal footwear, and gait retraining) on slowing OA progression, which could be pivotal for patient engagement and preventive care. Conclusions: The integration of AI with biomechanical modeling holds significant promise for enhancing the management of OA by not only predicting disease onset and progression but also by enabling personalized intervention plans. Future research should focus on the development of these models to include personalized, preventive strategies that could effectively engage patients and potentially delay or prevent the onset of OA. This approach could revolutionize patient care by making early, targeted intervention feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.