ReviewOsteoarthritis imaging2025
Genicular artery embolization and nerve ablation: Interventional radiology solutions for osteoarthritis related knee pain.
Review in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Special issue imaging and pain.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2026Article
- Safety of Knee Arthroplasty Following Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Osteoarthritis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major cause of chronic knee pain, with treatment options ranging from conservative therapies to total knee replacement. Minimally invasive, image-guided interventions such as genicular artery embolization (GAE) and genicular nerve ablation (GNA) have emerged as alternatives for patients with refractory OA-related pain. This review explores these techniques and the role of interventional radiologists in multidisciplinary OA management. Design: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the safety, efficacy, and technical aspects of GAE and GNA. GAE selectively embolizes genicular arteries supplying the knee joint and synovium, reducing synovitis by targeting abnormal neovascularity and hyperemia. The procedure is performed under fluoroscopic guidance and clinical studies have reported significant improvements in pain. GNA can be performed with ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance. This technique utilizes radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to denervate sensory nerves thereby alleviating knee pain. Conventional, pulsed, and cooled RFA techniques are available and have demonstrated neuro-ablative effects. Results: GAE and GNA have demonstrated high technical and clinical success, with significant reductions in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and other patient reported outcome measures. Pain relief usually lasts from 6 to 12 months, with GAE benefits reported up to 24 months. Both procedures exhibit favorable safety profiles, with mostly mild, self-limiting adverse events. Conclusion: GAE and GNA are effective minimally invasive options for patients who are not candidates for or unwilling to undergo knee replacement. Further randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to confirm long-term efficacy for these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.