ArticleJB & JS open access
Strain-Dependent Effects of Controlled Micromotion on Fracture Healing: Rethinking the Strain Threshold.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The strain required to optimize controlled micromotion in indirect (callus-mediated) fracture healing remains uncertain. Although the classic 2% to 10% strain range proposed by Perren is widely cited, several animal and clinical studies have reported healing at higher strain levels. This study evaluated the strain-healing relationship in a controlled micromotion model. We hypothesized that the strain threshold that supports healing exceeds 10%. Materials and Methods: A standardized 2-mm transverse osteotomy was created in Sprague-Dawley rats and stabilized with an external fixator capable of delivering precise micromotion. Five strain levels (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%) were applied once daily at 0.5 Hz for 30 minutes beginning 2 weeks after surgery and continued for 2 weeks. Healing was assessed by radiographs, micro-computed tomography, mechanical testing, histology, and immunohistochemistry. Results: A strain level of 20% was associated with the most favorable overall healing profile across radiographic, structural, and mechanical assessments, with no cases of nonunion. Lower strains demonstrated limited callus formation, while higher strains produced abundant early cartilage but delayed conversion to bone and reduced mineralization. Moderate strain was accompanied by balanced expression of IL-6, IL-1β, and RANKL/OPG, whereas excessive strain showed patterns consistent with impaired remodeling. Conclusions: Under stable fixation and before the fracture gap transitions to stiffer cartilaginous tissue, the functional upper limit of beneficial strain appears to exceed the traditional 10% threshold. Approximately 20% of compressive strain, applied between day 14 and 21 postosteotomy, provided the most balanced combination of early repair and subsequent remodeling in this model. Clinical Relevance: These findings suggest that controlled micromotion with 20% interfragmentary strain may be most relevant to fractures managed under relative stability and healing through callus formation. However, faster callus-mediated healing is not inherently clinically advantageous, and its value depends on fracture type, anatomical site, and fixation strategy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.