ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2026
Timing Matters: Optimizing Oncology Involvement in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Pathways in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore current practices and barriers in pediatric neuro-oncology care coordination, and to identify opportunities to optimize care pathways. Timely coordination between pediatric neurosurgery and oncology is critical for optimal outcomes in children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, in many centers, pediatric oncologists are not involved until after surgery, which contributes to treatment delays and repeated procedures. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among neurosurgeons and pediatric oncologists in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire addressed the timing of oncological involvement, neuroimaging practices, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology collection, and opinions on care coordination solutions. Results: A total of 62 responses were obtained. Only 29% of the participants reported presurgical oncology involvement in their typical practice, whereas 58% indicated that involvement occurred only after the final pathology results were obtained. Neuroimaging protocols varied: only 56.5% always performed dedicated CNS tumor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols before surgery, and spinal MRI was often delayed. CSF cytology practices were inconsistent, and major barriers included the lack of multidisciplinary tumor boards and the belief that oncology input before pathology is unnecessary. Over 88% of the respondents supported the use of presurgical tumor boards as a solution. Conclusion: There is substantial heterogeneity in pediatric neuro-oncology coordination practices. Efforts to promote early oncology consultations, standardized imaging protocols, and integrated care discussions may bridge critical gaps in care delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.