ReviewJADA foundational science2022
Development of standard protocols for biofilm-biomaterial interface testing.
Review in JADA foundational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional Characterization of Surface Properties and Microbial Biofilm Formation in Commercial Flowable Resin-Based Dental Composites.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Sustainable nanomaterials for precision dental medicine: green synthesis, therapeutic applications, and future directions.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Antibiofilm and antibacterial effects ofBiomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- The Effect of Pellicle on Biofilm Formation in a Supragingival Biofilm Model.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2025Article
- Smart biomaterials in restorative dentistry: Recent advances and future perspectives.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Progress in visible-light-activated photocatalytic coatings to combat implant-related infections: From mechanistic to translational roadmap.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Guidance on biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Fabrication methods, materials and biological considerations.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Review
- Novel antimicrobial and bioactive resin-based clear aligner attachment orthodontic materials.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
- Biofilm Formation on Hybrid, Resin-Based CAD/CAM Materials for Indirect Restorations: A Comprehensive Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Optimizing the use of low-frequency ultrasound for bacterial detachment of in vivo biofilms in dental research-a methodological study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Smart dental materials for antimicrobial applications.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- Preprocedural mouthwashes for infection control in dentistry-an update.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Review
- Bioactivity of Dental Restorative Materials: FDI Policy Statement.International dental journal · 2023Review
- Immunomodulatory IL-23 receptor antagonist peptide nanocoatings for implant soft tissue healing.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the cell viability and antimicrobial effects of orthodontic bands coated with silver or zinc oxide nanoparticles: AnKorean journal of orthodontics · 2023Article
- In-vitro models of biocompatibility testing for restorative dental materials: From 2D cultures to organs on-a-chip.Acta biomaterialia · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2024
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The oral biofilm is associated with the most common oral diseases such as caries, periodontitis, and peri-implantitis. It is also linked to failures of dental treatment approaches (eg, direct or indirect restorations because of adjacent caries). Therefore, the development of materials with antibacterial properties is desirable. However, the design of meaningful tests to confirm such properties faces severe problems because of the complexity of the interaction of materials with the oral biofilm. Furthermore, owing to practical reasons, such tests need to be performed in vitro. In contrast, there is a need for predictive data that are comparable between different laboratories. Therefore, standardization of such tests has been advocated. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) with its Technical Committee 106-Dentistry may be the relevant platform for this purpose. A standard (ISO 3990) is being developed for testing the antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials. This standard defines basic requirements for sample preparation, selection of bacterial strains, test methods and assessment, and reporting of results. It is considered to be the first step, and regular revisions are planned as new scientific evidence emerges. The support of the scientific communities providing multidisciplinary input is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.