ArticleReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
General Anaesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Differences in Pulmonary Infections.
Article in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve replacement are particularly vulnerable and require a more sophisticated anesthetic therapeutic approach. According to the literature, no study has directly compared general anaesthesia with conscious analgosedation using postoperative infections as the primary endpoint. Methods: Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 3313 patients from a large heart center in Western Europe were included in this study. One group received general anaesthesia, and the other group received analgosedation for TAVI. The primary outcome was postinterventional pneumonia; secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction, renal failure, stroke, and 30-day mortality. Propensity score matching using 16 matching criteria yielded over 1000 pairs. Results: No difference was observed in the incidence of postinterventional pneumonia ( Conclusions: Regarding postinterventional pneumonia, general anaesthesia can be used as safely as analgosedation during TAVI. However, since renal failure requiring temporary replacement therapy and mortality are both increased with general anaesthesia, analgosedation should be the standard of care for TAVI in high-volume centers. The anesthetic regimen must be determined on an individual basis and discussed during the heart team briefing. The conversion to, or primary use of, general anaesthesia when clinically indicated is safe. Overall, ensuring the continuous presence of a senior consultant anesthetist, specifically trained in cardiac anaesthesia, throughout the procedure is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.