ArticleSAGE open medicine2026
Oral health after stroke: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare professionals, stroke survivors and primary caregivers.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Maintaining good oral health after stroke is challenging due to physical and cognitive impairments and hospital-related factors. This study aimed to understand the oral and/or denture care (ODC) practices of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and explore the oral health and ODC experiences of stroke survivors (StS). Methods: We used a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were derived from a survey of HCPs in acute stroke care and rehabilitation and from a retrospective chart review of admissions over one year. An embedded qualitative multiple case study with StS admitted to rehabilitation gathered information from care observations, oral examinations, semi-structured interviews, and charts. Results: The survey involved 32 HCPs. All believed that ODC was part of self-care and over 90% believed that toothbrushing helps patients feel better and provides comfort while eating. However, 59% indicated insufficient training to perform oral health assessments and provide ODC. The chart review included 168 charts: 103 from acute care and 65 from rehabilitation. Notations about patient oral health status were written by nurses or speech-language pathologists in 46% and 65% of acute care and rehabilitation charts, respectively. ODC occurred less than once/day in acute care. In rehabilitation, occupational therapists assessed ODC functions in 55% of patients, but documentation of ODC provision was lacking. Qualitative themes from the case study included i) Valued oral health and ODC, ii) Independent ODC before stroke, iii) inconsistent support for ODC in acute care, iv) increased self-efficacy despite irregular ODC during rehabilitation, and v) ongoing reliance on caregivers or staff for ODC. Conclusions: This study identified significant gaps in oral health and ODC practices during post-stroke hospitalization despite attention to oral health from HCPs. Both settings lacked evidence-based ODC approaches tailored to patient needs. We advocate for protocols that include oral screening tools, promote twice-daily toothbrushing, and incorporate ODC education for HCPs, StS, and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.