ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Phenotype-Specific Recalibration of MAVE Data Enables Repurposing of
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Multiplexed assays of variant effect (MAVEs) are transforming clinical variant interpretation. However, many genes are associated with more than one disease, making it unclear whether functional data generated in one disease context may be directly applicable to another. For example, germline Methods: Saturation genome editing (SGE) data for Results: Phenotype-specific recalibration using Conclusion: Phenotype-specific recalibration enables appropriately calibrated reuse of MAVE datasets across distinct disease contexts, increasing the clinical utility of MAVE datasets and the interpretability of variants in pleiotropic genes. This framework expands the diagnostic utility of existing functional datasets without requiring new experimental assays.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.