ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Impact of Imaging Protocols on Thermal Detection of Pressure Injuries: Threshold versus Deep Learning Across Skin Tones.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pressure injuries represent a significant healthcare challenge requiring early detection to prevent severe complications. While thermal imaging shows promise for detecting early pressure related temperature changes, its robustness across varying imaging conditions and diverse patient populations remains unclear. This study systematically evaluated how imaging protocol variations (lighting, distance, positioning, camera type) and participant skin tone influence classification model performance for thermal cooling detection. Using a controlled cooling protocol to simulate early pressure injury temperature changes, we collected 1,680 images from 35 diverse participants across 12 imaging protocol variations. We compared two approaches: three deep learning models (MobileNetV2, InceptionNetV3, ResNet50) and a threshold-based approach using an optimal fixed threshold temperature differential. Deep learning models outperformed the threshold-based approach, achieving 98.699.6% accuracy compared to 95.6%, with superior performance across all imaging protocols and skin tone groups. Threshold-based approach showed camera-dependent misclassification patterns across skin tones. On the high-resolution FLIR E8XT, the MST 7-10 group had 8 of 11 misclassifications. This pattern shifted on the low-resolution FLIR ONE Pro, where the intermediate skin tone group (MST 6) had 22 of 44 total misclassifications. In contrast, deep learning models maintained consistent performance across all skin tone groups and imaging protocols. Visualization analysis of the deep learning models suggested that these models focused on thermal gradients at cooling region boundaries, suggesting that spatial temperature gradients, not single-value thresholds, are critical for accurate detection. These findings suggest the potential of deep learning-based approaches to maintain robust, equitable performance across diverse skin tones and imaging conditions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.