ArticleAsian journal of urology2026
Optimal techniques for managing lower polar arteries in kidney transplantation.
Article in Asian journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Kidney transplantation is the gold standard treatment for end-stage renal disease; however, variations in renal arterial anatomy, particularly the presence of additional lower polar arteries (LPAs), pose surgical challenges. The optimal management of the LPAs remains unclear. This study aimed to compare three surgical techniques for LPA anastomosis in kidney transplantation, focusing on both short- and long-term outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Joint Stock Company "National Scientific Centre of Surgery named after Alexander Nikolaevich Syzganov" between January 2012 and August 2024. Forty-eight kidney transplant recipients with an LPA were analysed. Patients were grouped by surgical technique: Group 1 (end-to-side anastomosis of the LPA to the main renal artery), Group 2 (anastomosis of the LPA to the inferior epigastric artery), and Group 3 (side-to-side reconstruction between the main renal artery and the LPA). Intraoperative parameters, graft function, and complications were assessed. Results: The groups were comparable in demographics and baseline renal function. Cold ischaemia time was the longest in Group 3, whereas Group 2 had the longest recipient-phase operation time. Postoperative complications were similar across groups, with one Grade III-IV complication reported in Group 3. Graft function, measured by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate at 5 days, 1 month, and 1 year, showed no significant differences among groups. One-year graft survival was 100% for Groups 1 and 2 and 94% for Group 3. Conclusion: All three techniques yielded comparable graft function and survival rates, with minor variations in cold ischaemia time and complications. Tailoring the surgical approach to individual patient anatomy is critical for optimising outcomes in kidney transplantation involving an LPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.