Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238331›Full record

ArticlePublic health weekly report2026

A Review of Interministerial and Local Government Simulation Training on Zoonotic Diseases.

Min Hye Lee, Jin A Oh, Woo Ri Shim, Hyun-Il Shin, Seon Young Lee, Ho Jin Nam, Sang Gu Yeo

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Min Hye LeeDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Department of Infectious Disease Policy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9052-2206
Jin A OhDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Department of Infectious Disease Policy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2830-9351
Woo Ri ShimDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Department of Infectious Disease Policy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2501-2679
Hyun-Il ShinDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Department of Infectious Disease Policy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8146-7208
Seon Young LeeDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Department of Infectious Disease Policy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2734-3594
Ho Jin NamDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Department of Infectious Disease Policy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5558-8890
Sang Gu YeoDivision of Control for Zoonotic and Vector Borne Disease, Department of Infectious Disease Policy, Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Cheongju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-1051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify limitations in interministerial role allocation and information sharing during the response to the 2025 Methods: A tabletop exercise was conducted with 34 interministerial practitioners using scenarios based on actual Results: Participants' subjective understanding of risk assessment improved significantly, from an average score of 2.47 to 3.94 points. The "perception of the importance of interministerial collaboration" received the highest score (4.56 points). While participants gained experience in mediating conflicts between the social impact of pet-borne zoonoses and quarantine priorities, they reported a high cognitive burden during when formulating qualitative justifications for risk characterization. Conclusions: An effective response to companion animal-derived zoonoses such as

Indexed as

Brucella canisJoint risk assessmentOne healthTable-top exerciseZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID42238331
PMCPMC13228913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.