ArticleJournal of rehabilitation2025
The Effect of Race/Ethnicity and Disability Status Concordance between Counselors and Clients on the Vocational Rehabilitation Process and Employment Outcomes: A Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This scoping review investigated existing literature on the impact of race/ethnicity and disability status concordance between counselors and clients on the vocational rehabilitation (VR) process and outcomes (especially competitive integrated employment). The goal was to provide evidence on the efficacy of the positive impact of concordance in VR beyond perceptions. However, the analysis included only eleven publications (five on race/ethnicity and six on disability status concordance). This was an extremely sparse cohort of studies (11 studies reviewed) with mixed findings. For the impact of race/ethnicity concordance on the VR process and outcomes, the findings from the five studies were mixed with a few showing a positive or mixed impact (i.e., both positive and negative) while several other inquiries revealed inconclusive or no impact. For disability status concordance, the findings were more conclusive in that four of the five studies indicated a positive impact on the VR process (i.e., client and counselor perceptions of the benefit of concordance). There was an additional disability concordance publication that was a literature review. Only 1 of the 11 total studies was explicit about employment as an outcome. Overall, there appears to be optimism that race/ethnicity and disability status concordance between counselors and clients is beneficial, but the evidence to date is relatively weak due to the small number of studies available in this scoping review. There is an opportunity to strengthen the evidence base, particularly in the employment domain, by investigating concordance practice interventions at the intervention development stage-of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42238318PMC13227595What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.