ArticleJournal of rehabilitation2025
A Scoping Review of Frameworks for Promoting Employment among Multiply Marginalized People with Disabilities.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this scoping review was to classify data about existing employment frameworks for people with disabilities, map out research gaps, and provide recommendations that could inform the development of a new national intersectional framework for multiply marginalized people with disabilities (MMPWD) as defined by race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, poverty status, and rural geography. Thematic analysis was used to inductively identify nine overarching domains: (a) legislative and policy mechanisms, (b) interagency and intra-agency collaborations, (c) empowerment of individuals with disabilities, (d) workplace disability participation, (e) career readiness and transition services, (f) inclusive entrepreneurship and wealth creation, (g) fair pay requirements, (h) disability inclusion awareness and advocacy, and (i) intersectional experiences in disability and employment. To address the literature gap and long-standing inequities, there is a critical need for a new framework that can guide disability policy and service, research agencies (e.g., Rehabilitation Services Administration, state vocational rehabilitation agencies, Office of Disability Employment Policy, Social Security Administration, Small Business Administration, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation), employers, and researchers in their effort to promote employment and economic security among MMPWD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42238316PMC13227592What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.