ArticleSaudi medical journal2026
Prognostic Significance of Lymphovascular Invasion in Breast Cancer: Insights From a Retrospective Analysis at a Tertiary Care Center.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the relationship between lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and outcomes across different histopathological subtypes, tumor grades, clinical stages, hormone receptor profiles, and treatment modalities. Lymphovascular invasion is a well-recognized histopathological feature associated with tumor dissemination in breast cancer. However, its prognostic weight is under-reported in Middle Eastern cohorts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 828 women treated for invasive breast carcinoma at King Abdulaziz University Hospital from 2010 to 2020. Clinicopathologic variables, treatments, and outcomes were extracted. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were estimated and tested using Kaplan-Meier curves; independent predictors were identified with stepwise Cox models. Results: Lymphovascular invasion was identified in 31.5% of cases, and Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly reduced mean OS (9.94 vs. 12.43 years; Conclusion: Our findings underscore LVI as a robust and independent prognostic factor for poor survival outcomes in breast cancer, with implications for multiple clinicopathologic and therapeutic contexts. These results support the routine incorporation of LVI into prognostic models and treatment algorithms in breast cancer management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.