Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238136›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancer: An Umbrella Review.

George V Joy, Jibin Kunjavara, Kamaruddeen Mannethodi, Amel Daw, Abdulqadir J Nashwan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

George V JoyNursing & Midwifery Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Jibin KunjavaraNursing & Midwifery Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Kamaruddeen MannethodiNursing & Midwifery Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Amel DawNursing & Midwifery Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Abdulqadir J NashwanNursing & Midwifery Research, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) present significant challenges in diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognostication due to their heterogeneous nature and anatomical complexity. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has emerged as a transformative tool for developing clinical decision support systems (CDSS) that enhance precision in oncology. However, the breadth of AI applications in HNC has often obscured specific insights into their clinical impact. This umbrella review critically evaluates the role of AI-supported CDSS, with a focus on CNN-based models, in improving diagnostic accuracy, guiding treatment decisions, and refining prognostic predictions in HNC. Systematic reviews (SRs) published on AI applications in HNC were identified and synthesized. Data were extracted on clinical utility, methodological rigor, and reported limitations. The methodological quality of the included reviews was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 (AMSTAR-2) to ensure reliability of the synthesized evidence. A total of 47 SRs met the inclusion criteria. CNN-driven CDSS demonstrated strong performance in diagnostic imaging and histopathology, with accuracy often comparable to or surpassing that of expert clinicians. In treatment planning, AI-assisted models improved tumor delineation, predicted radiotherapy-related toxicities, and provided intraoperative decision support through modalities such as hyperspectral imaging (HSI) and optical coherence tomography. Prognostic CDSS integrating radiomics, clinical, and molecular data outperformed traditional staging systems in predicting recurrence and survival. Nevertheless, widespread clinical translation is limited by retrospective study designs, small and heterogeneous datasets, lack of external validation, and concerns about interpretability. This review provides precise insights into how CNN-based models can enhance clinical decision-making in HNC. These systems hold the potential to transform oncology practice by improving diagnostic reliability, optimizing therapeutic strategies, and enabling personalized prognostic assessments. Future research should prioritize prospective multi-center validation, standardized evaluation protocols, and the development of interpretable models to ensure safe and effective integration of AI-CDSS into clinical care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (ai)convolutional neural networks (cnn)deep learning (dl)diagnosticshead and neck cancer (hnc)machine learning (ml)prognosticsradiomicssystematic reviewstreatment planning

Identifiers

PMID42238136
PMCPMC13226959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.