ArticleArXiv2026
Smart strategies to navigate turbulent odor plumes reorienting to local wind.
Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Olfactory search in turbulent environments is a sensorimotor problem that many animals solve with remarkable efficiency, yet replicating this ability in artificial systems is an enduring challenge because detections are intermittent and wind direction fluctuates strongly, rendering standard search strategies unreliable. We introduce a wind-relative reinforcement-learning framework in which an agent navigates a turbulent plume with a single internal variable - the elapsed time since the last odor detection - and selects actions relative to a locally estimated wind direction filtered through an exponential memory kernel. Policies are trained and evaluated in direct numerical simulations of turbulence, capturing the multi-scale characteristics of velocity and odor fields in natural environments, both in the presence and absence of a mean wind. In a mild mean wind, the learned policy outperforms well-known biomimetic policies such as cast-and-surge regardless of the wind memory time, yet adapts its movement pattern to wind-estimation quality. In isotropic turbulence, performance peaks at an intermediate wind memory time, identifying temporal wind integration as a regime-dependent resource. Our results highlight the importance of developing and validating olfactory-navigation strategies under realistic turbulent conditions, and offer a compact design principle for minimal robotic olfactory navigation and testable predictions for biological search behavior.
Identifiers
42238073PMC13229087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.