Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238066›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

FBApro: A fast, simple linear transformation for diverse metabolic modeling tasks.

Ariel Bruner, Mona Singh

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ariel BrunerPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-7769
Mona SinghPrinceton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8271-6026

Funding

Interaction-based computational methods for analyzing cancer genomesR01CA208148 · NCI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI MONA SINGH · 2016 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constraint-based metabolic modeling is the predominant framework for simulating cellular metabolism. The central assumption of these models is that metabolism operates at a steady state, meaning that the production and consumption rates of each metabolite are balanced. This assumption imposes linear constraints on the fluxes of biochemical reactions. Flux Balance Analysis (FBA), a fundamental method in the field, is formulated as an optimization problem maximizing a cellular objective (e.g., growth) over the resulting linear subspace of steady state fluxes. Many other methods in the field are expressed either as a modification to FBA, or use FBA as a black box within an algorithm. Here, we propose a general alternative to optimization called FBApro. For any given vector of reference fluxes, FBApro finds the closest flux vector within the steady-state subspace, and accounts for both partially given reference fluxes and exact constraints on reactions. While FBApro is the solution to a quadratic program, we show that it can be implemented as a single linear operation using orthogonal projections to corresponding affine spaces and sets of linear equations. The overall approach is computationally efficient, does not require a cellular objective, and is easy to implement. We formally derive the closed-form expressions for FBApro and simpler variants, and validate it on both synthetic and real cancer cell line data.

Indexed as

Applied computing → Systems biologyconstraint-based metabolic modelingflux balance analysismetabolic modeling

Identifiers

PMID42238066
PMCPMC13229077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.