Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42238065›Full record

ArticleArXiv2026

Cilia-driven transport in confined ducts: an active porous media model.

J P Raimondi, Feng Ling, Eva Kanso

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J P RaimondiDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Feng LingDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.
Eva KansoDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA.

Funding

Quantitative analysis of mucociliary clearance in airway ciliopathiesR01HL153622 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KANSO, EVA, RYAN, AMY LEANNE · 2021 to 2024
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ciliated organs transport viscous fluids through confined ducts, yet how duct morphology and ciliary activity jointly set the limits of flow rate and sustainable pressure remains unclear. Here, we model dense arrays of beating cilia lining duct walls as an active porous medium driven by prescribed metachronal waves, and identify two key morphological parameters that govern transport: the ciliary confinement ratio and the mean ciliary fraction. The resulting flows are described by the incompressible Navier-Stokes-Brinkman equations, which we solve numerically using a spectral method in the low-Reynolds-number regime. We also develop a complementary mean-field analytical model. The active porous medium framework provides an intermediate description between classical envelope theories and filament-resolved simulations and enables a systematic investigation of how fluid transport is shaped by confinement and packing of ciliary material. We find that transport is characterized by a decreasing linear relationship between flow rate and pressure generation, marking a fundamental trade-off between throughput and sustainable adverse pressure. These results provide a unified physical interpretation of the morphological diversity of ciliated ducts, from high-throughput ciliary carpets to pressure-generating ciliary flames, and offer guiding principles for the design of bio-inspired microfluidic pumps.

Indexed as

active porous mediabiological transportBrinkman equationsciliary flowslow-Reynolds-number flows

Identifiers

PMID42238065
PMCPMC13229090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.