ReviewIranian journal of medical sciences2026
Revolutionizing Stem Cell Sorting with Machine Learning: A Review of Trends, Tools, and Future Directions.
Review in Iranian journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stem cells are critical tools in regenerative medicine, large-scale cell production, drug discovery, and cell-based therapies, making their precise identification and sorting essential for advancing both research and clinical applications. Accurate stem cell sorting enables improved therapeutic outcomes, efficient production pipelines, and more reliable biological studies. Traditional sorting methods, while effective, face challenges related to speed, scalability, cost, and human error. Recent advances in machine learning (ML) techniques based on image and video processing have revolutionized stem cell sorting by enabling rapid, automated, and highly accurate classification. In addition to visual data approaches, non-visual processing methods using ML have also emerged as powerful tools for stem cell analysis and separation. In this review, various ML-driven strategies for stem cell sorting, with a particular focus on visual and non-visual data processing methodologies and their applications in different stem cell types, have been comprehensively explored and categorized based on the input data types, ML techniques, stem cell types, study objectives, and performance metrics. Furthermore, an overview of the historical development of stem cell sorting technologies and ML applications was introduced, and emerging automated systems, software solutions, start-ups, and future directions for this type of stem cell sorters were discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.