ArticleOsteoarthritis imaging2024
Standardized maps - an emerging approach to leverage quantitative information in knee imaging.
Article in Osteoarthritis imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 18th international workshop on osteoarthritis imaging. Structure and pain: Where are we today?Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Review
- Imaging of cartilage, meniscus, and beyond: Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT).Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
- Editorial for the Special -Issue on Biomechanics and Imaging.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Property maps, which capture spatial variations across the entire joint, are emerging as a powerful means for extracting and analyzing quantitative information from knee 3D imaging datasets, particularly from CT and MRI data. This perspective paper aims to discuss the processing pipelines used so far, as well as the results they have enabled with respect to osteoarthritis. Design: The key methodological steps for obtaining property maps, including segmentation, property calculation, and standardization are presented and analysis methods are discussed. Representative studies are also examined to illustrate the state-of-the-art in this field. Results: Three main processing pipelines have been used, with the segmentation, property calculation, and standardization steps occurring in different orders. Many methods have been successfully considered for ordering these steps, without any looking generally preferable to the others. Thanks to recent advances in segmentation and standardization techniques, routine processing of property maps appears conceivable in the near future. Maps have been analyzed for multiple purposes, including group comparisons, pattern recognition, and cross-property modelling. Mostly maps of cartilage thickness and composition, as well as maps of bone shape and mineral density have been reported. They revealed distinct patterns associated with osteoarthritis severity, achieved high diagnostic accuracy, and identified relationships among tissue properties. Conclusions: Property maps represent a promising approach for leveraging the extensive information in imaging data. They are particularly interesting for standardizing complex spatial variations in tissue properties, enabling global analysis and modelling. Once challenging to obtain and interpret, current mapping methods are being improved to the point that property maps may well be in routine use in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.