Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237985›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2026

Social Support and Psychological Capital in Older Adults with Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Amir Hossein Dehghan, Matineh Sadat Tabatabaei, Richard Mottershead, Golnar Ghane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir Hossein DehghanStudents' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0007-1061-2253
Matineh Sadat TabatabaeiStudents' Scientific Research Center (SSRC), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0001-5284-4956
Richard MottersheadSakina, Behavioural Science Institute, SEHA, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-0048-0553
Golnar GhaneMedical-Surgical Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastrointestinal cancers impose a significant psychological burden on older adults by depleting crucial personal resources. While social support is a known buffer against distress, its specific association with psychological capital (PsyCap) in this population, particularly after the completion of primary treatment, remains under-investigated. This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived social support and PsyCap (self-efficacy, hope, resilience, and optimism) in this patient group. Methods: This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in Tehran, Iran, between July and December 2024. The sample included 310 adults aged ≥60 years with non-metastatic esophageal or gastric cancer. Crucially, all participants were assessed during their follow-up phase, 3-12 months after completing their primary treatment (surgery and/or chemo/radiotherapy). Data were collected using the MacGee Psychological Capital Questionnaire (26 items) and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS, 22 items), and analyzed using correlation and multiple linear regression. Results: A significant positive correlation was found between overall perceived social support and psychological capital (r = 0.380, p < 0.01). PsyCap levels were moderate (mean = 71.21), with hope and resilience as the strongest components. Notably, support from friends was rated higher than support from family. Continued engagement in part-time work was a significant predictor of both higher social support and PsyCap. Conclusion: In this post-treatment cohort, higher perceived social support is associated with greater psychological capital. However, due to the cross-sectional design, these findings should be interpreted as state-dependent, hypothesis-generating data rather than evidence for definitive clinical recommendations. Future longitudinal studies are essential to establish causality and to inform targeted supportive care interventions. Implications for Nursing Practice: Findings suggest that nursing interventions aimed at assessing and strengthening social networks, particularly friendships, and encouraging meaningful engagement like part-time work, may be beneficial for bolstering the psychological resources of older cancer survivors in their recovery phase.

Indexed as

ageddigestive system neoplasmspsychological capitalsocial support

Identifiers

PMID42237985
PMCPMC13227539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.