Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237977›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2026

Microbiological Profile and Antibiotic Resistance in Relation to Risk of Recurrence and Fistula Following Perianal Abscess Drainage:

Saleh A Busbait

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Saleh A BusbaitAssistant Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4233-583X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The practice of obtaining routine intraoperative cultures and administering postoperative antibiotics for perianal abscess treatment continues to be debated, so far, there is no established evidence linking these practices to improved patient outcomes. This study investigated the microbial distribution together with antibiotic resistance and their relationship to abscess recurrence or fistula development. Methods: The study analyzed 242 patients who received their first perianal abscess treatment through incision and drainage procedures at a Saudi Arabian tertiary center from 2019 to 2023. Swab cultures were obtained intraoperatively. A descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests and antibiotic resistance were analyzed. Results: The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Conclusion: The practice of routine intraoperative cultures together with empirical antibiotic use shows limited effectiveness in predicting or preventing recurrence or fistula formation following uncomplicated perianal abscess drainage. Surgical adequacy stands as the fundamental principle for effective management.

Indexed as

AbscessAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnus DiseasesDrainageDrug Resistance, MicrobialRectal FistulaAdultCiprofloxacinDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCiprofloxacinAntibiotic resistanceFistula formationMicrobiological profilePerianal abscessSurgical drainage

Identifiers

PMID42237977
PMCPMC13227423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.