ArticleZoological research2026
Beak height and nest structure shape avian bite force.
Article in Zoological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bite force is a key performance trait in vertebrates, affecting prey capture, defense, resource competition, and other ecologically important behaviors. Despite broad functional relevance, systematic studies on avian bite force remain limited across species, and the morphological indicators used to infer bite performance are often inconsistent. The evolutionary mechanisms proposed to shape bite force, including diet, combat, and nest-complexity hypotheses, also remain insufficiently tested at broad comparative scales. Here, bite force and associated morphological traits were measured across 175 bird species to evaluate anatomical predictors of bite performance. Comparative analyses revealed that beak morphology, particularly beak depth, was more strongly correlated with bite force than cranial shape excluding the beak. To examine macroevolutionary patterns, newly generated measurements were integrated with published data, yielding a dataset of bite force values for 223 species. Phylogenetic generalized least-squares models were then used to assess proposed ecological and behavioral drivers of bite force, including body mass, diet, competition intensity, and nest structure. In addition to the allometric effect of body mass, nest-structure complexity emerged as a significant predictor of bite force, with species that construct more elaborate nests exhibiting stronger bite performance. These findings are consistent with the nest-complexity hypothesis and indicate that nest-building behavior has likely contributed to evolutionary diversification of bite force in birds. This broad comparative analysis clarifies the anatomical basis of avian bite performance and identifies key behavioral factors associated with the evolution of bite force.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.