ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Untangling weight from height: A generalised body mass index (gBMI) approach to evaluating child and adolescent nutritional status in India.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Weight-for-height (WHZ) and body mass index (BMI)-for-age (BAZ) are commonly used to assess child overnutrition but have limitations: they conflate skeletal growth with body weight, correlate with height, and inadequately distinguish fat from lean mass, particularly during puberty. This study proposes an India-specific generalised body mass index (gBMI), an age- and sex-specific power-type index adapted from Benn's concept, to better capture adiposity. Methods Exponent parameters for gBMI were estimated using healthy-child data, selected by WHO selection criteria, from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3,4,5) and the Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS), comprising 12,466 children under 5 years and 6,487 aged 5-19 years. Polynomial regression to model age- and sex-specific variation in the weight-height relationship was used to estimate the exponents of height, and growth curves were generated using generalised additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS) with location scale and shape (LMS) methods. Validation employed independent data from 457 urban schoolchildren aged 5-16 years in Bengaluru, including fat and lean mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results The exponent varied with age (1.3 in infancy, ∼2.9 in pubertal boys, 2.7 in girls, stabilising at ∼2 in late adolescence). Unlike BMI, gBMI residuals showed near-zero correlation with height. gBMI-for-age Z-scores (gBAZ) showed lower wasting in children under 5 years (10.7% vs. 19.2% using WHZ) and higher adolescent overnutrition (8.7% vs. <1% using BAZ). Validation showed stronger association of gBAZ with body fat (r=0.70) than BAZ (r=0.65). Interpretation and conclusions The gBMI provides an adaptable, height-independent, and adiposity-sensitive index for assessing malnutrition and obesity in children and adolescents. Its use could refine nutritional surveillance and interventions, with potential wider applicability with longitudinal evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.