SynthesisEuropean journal of neurology2026
Machine Learning for Diagnosis and Differentiation of Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeCentral disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) are, except for Narcolepsy Type 1 (NT1), difficult to diagnose and manage because of overlapping features and the lack of reliable biomarkers. Machine learning (ML) has the potential to improve diagnosis by detecting subtle physiological patterns and distinguishing between CDH subtypes. This review systematically explores current ML applications in CDH, assesses their limitations, and suggests future directions.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (up to June 2025) were searched for studies using ML to classify or characterize CDH in adults. ML methods, data types, and diagnostic outcomes were extracted and analyzed.
resultsOut of 3274 studies, 41 met the inclusion criteria (37 peer-reviewed articles and 4 preprints). Data sources included neuroimaging (fMRI, PET), sleep assessments (MSLT, polysomnography), demographics, and standardized questionnaires. Supervised ML reliably identified known features, including early REM onset, hypocretin deficiency, and spectral EEG changes, showing strong performance for NT1 but limited generalizability across other CDH subtypes. Although many studies reported high accuracy, clinical relevance was often limited by rigid diagnostic labels that may not reflect the true complexity of CDH. Unsupervised learning uncovered heterogeneous phenotypes and exposed limitations in existing diagnostic labels.
conclusionML has the potential to improve CDH diagnosis. Deep learning models are promising for feature extraction; however, their black-box nature and high data requirements hinder clinical application. Future advancements depend on large, diverse datasets, multimodal and longitudinal data, and close collaboration between clinicians and data scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.