ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Distinct Physiological Mechanisms Drive Grey Matter Plasticity in Complex Versus Simple Sequence Learning.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging at sub-millimeter resolution opens the possibility to assess subtle longitudinal changes in brain structure and function. Identifying the regions and putative mechanisms involved in learning specific motor sequences is a key step towards understanding neuroplasticity. To disambiguate sequence-specific learning from simple motor execution, the present study trained an experimental group over five consecutive days on a complex motor sequence and contrasted them with a control group who performed a simple sequence. Both groups were scanned at 4 time points with magnetic resonance imaging at 7 Tesla with MP2RAGE. Training-related grey matter (GM) structural plasticity was assessed with voxel-based morphometry (VBM: time by group interaction) on T1w uniform intensity images and followed up with a focused investigation of quantitative T1 values (qT1) to probe the physiological changes driving GM plasticity. Our interaction analyses identified significant differences in the precuneus, superior parietal cortex (SPC), and angular gyrus (AG) where GM increases were greater in the experimental group. Of these regions, only the left SPC (during slow learning) exhibited sequence-specific plasticity-where the magnitude of change was greater in the experimental vs. the control group. Interestingly, while the experimental group showed increased GM volume, the control group was characterized by decreases. Post hoc comparisons revealed that the control group exhibited increasing T1 across days 1, 2 and 5, while the experimental group initially increased (day 1 to 2) and then decreased (day 2 to 5), suggesting that the two groups underwent differential physiological change as a function of training. These findings align with invasive animal studies showing that learning simple tasks is characterized by angiogenesis while learning complex sequences initially leads to synaptogenesis and is then followed by intracortical myelination as the sequence is well learned. Our findings provide initial evidence in humans that learning a complex sequence induces GM increases that are likely driven by synaptogenesis for initial encoding and myelogenesis for later learning and consolidation, while habituating to a simple repeated task leads to GM decreases due to attenuated blood flow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.