ArticlePsychological medicine2026
Determining the relative importance of risk and protective factors for adjustment disorder symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic by mixed-effects random forests.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic exposed individuals to numerous psychosocial and health-related stressors associated with adjustment disorder (AjD) symptoms, yet it remains unclear which factors are most predictive.
methodsUsing mixed-effects regression random forests (MERF), a machine learning approach that combines random forests with mixed-effects regressions, we analyzed longitudinal data from 15,155 adults across 11 European countries collected at three time points between June 2020 and January 2022. We evaluated 245 candidate predictors, including sociodemographic, pandemic-related, and health-related factors, for their relative importance in predicting AjD symptoms (ADNM-8).
resultsThe seven most influential predictors, ranked in descending order of importance, were uncertainty about the pandemic's duration and risks, poor health, social isolation, conflicts at home, loss of daily structure, fear of infection, and restricted personal contact with close others.
conclusionsAjD symptoms were most strongly linked to factors related to lack of control (e.g., uncertainty, loss of daily structure, fear of infection), as well as current poor health and reduced social connectedness. Interventions that enhance a sense of control through clear communication, help individuals re-establish daily routines, and strengthen social connectedness may mitigate AjD symptoms during future public health crises. Our findings also highlight the potential of machine learning approaches for identifying complex patterns across high-dimensional predictors of clinical symptoms, which may improve prediction accuracy in mental health research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.