ArticleJournal of breast cancer2026
Isolated Regional Nodal Recurrence After Primary Breast Cancer: Risk Factors and Survival by Mode of Detection.
Article in Journal of breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe prognostic relevance of the detection mode for regional lymph node recurrence (LNR) remains unclear. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with isolated regional LNR and to evaluate the impact of the mode of detection on distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included women who underwent surgery for stage I-III invasive breast cancer between January 2011 and December 2019, with follow-up until December 2024. Isolated regional LNR was categorized according to the detection method (imaging vs. symptoms). Risk factors were identified using the Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazard model, and DMFS and OS were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests.
resultsAmong 13,406 women (median age, 49 years; range, 20-87 years), 126 (0.9%) developed isolated regional LNR during a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Of these, 118 (93.7%) were detected through imaging and 8 (6.3%) through symptoms. Independent risk factors for isolated regional LNR included higher T stages (T2: hazard ratio [HR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.64; T3: HR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.68-5.65), higher N stages (N2: HR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.54-5.75; N3: HR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.36-7.13), triple-negative subtype (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.09-2.67), and omission of adjuvant radiotherapy (HR, 4.35; 95% CI, 2.86-6.67). Radiological patterns varied by detection, with ultrasound usually detecting level I nodes (51.6%) and computed tomography detecting internal mammary nodes (58.1%). Symptom-detected recurrence frequently occurred in the supraclavicular region (50.0%). Symptom-detected LNRs were associated with significantly worse DMFS (
conclusionThe detection mode was associated with DMFS, but not OS, suggesting that long-term outcomes are driven more by disease biology than by how recurrence is detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.