ArticleBMC psychology2026
The value of peer-support after the 22 July 2011 terrorattack: a follow-up focus-group study of gatherings for survivors from Utøya in Tromsø, Norway.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis article addresses the significance of group-based follow-up for a group of young survivors (n = 20) from Tromsø after the 22 July 2011 terror attack on Utøya in Norway, where 69 people were killed. The group was started at the request of the survivors and took place for two hours every other week, totaling 64 gatherings, during the period 2011-2014. It was led by two experienced psychiatric nurses and consisted of one part where the leaders introduced psychoeducational topics and another part with free reflection focusing on the emotional challenges the participants wanted to discuss. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe informants (13) were gathered for focus group interviews in 2023, 12 years after the terror event. The interviews were recorded on video, transcribed, and the analysis was conducted as an interpretive, thematic qualitative analysis, inspired by principles from Grounded Theory. All the informants were given the option to review the draft of this text.
resultsThe participants expressed that they greatly benefited from the group sessions and that the sense of community within the group was the most important aspect, still representing a central belonging in their lives. They emphasized that knowing others who understood the traumatic events and experiences made it possible, over time, to endure and process memories well enough to move forward in life in a positive way. A clear finding was the importance of starting early and maintaining a "watchful waiting" approach for as long as required for the traumatic experiences to be processed. At the time of the follow-up study, this process was still ongoing for all participants, even though the greatest need for help had passed when the groups were discontinued after three years in 2014. DISCUSSION: The participants were generally very positive to the group sessions. They experienced that the group fostered a sense of community and belonging. It was a crucial element of these gatherings that professionals took responsibility for establishing and leading the group, while also emphasizing factors such as psychoeducation, normalization, humor, activity, and solidarity. Over time, it is important to work towards survivors generating a sense of belonging and agency that can help them face future challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.