ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Air embolism resulting from contrast agent injection during coronary computed tomography: a case report.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAir embolism is a rare but potentially lethal iatrogenic complication. Clinicians must recognize its warning signs and implement timely standardized interventions, as early detection is crucial to reduce morbidity and mortality. This report presents a case of venous air embolism following coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). CASE PRESENTATION: A 60-year-old female developed air embolism due to contrast agent administration during a coronary CT study, presenting with new-onset dyspnea and dizziness approximately 1 min after the end of contrast injection, immediately after completing the CT scan. Following treatment including high-flow oxygen therapy (10 L/min), fluid resuscitation, and left lateral decubitus position with head down, her vital signs stabilized and arterial blood gas parameters returned to normal. A follow-up CT scan 7 days later showed complete absorption of the air emboli, and the patient was discharged uneventfully. DISCUSSION: The patient was diagnosed with grade 1 venous air embolism (VAE) according to the Tubingen VAE grading scale, with an estimated air volume of 5-10mL. The mild clinical manifestations were consistent with the small air volume and slow entry rate, and the patient achieved a favorable prognosis with timely standardized interventions. This case highlights the importance of vigilance for VAE during contrast-enhanced CT, even in patients with mild and non-specific symptoms.
conclusionWhile rare, air embolism can cause mild symptoms with small volumes, but larger volumes may be life-threatening. Air embolism should be suspected in patients with sudden neurological, respiratory or cardiovascular symptoms, especially in the presence of iatrogenic risk factors. Prompt cessation of the embolism source, appropriate patient positioning, high-flow oxygen therapy, and hyperbaric oxygen treatment when indicated should be initiated immediately to minimize air entry into the right ventricular outflow tract. These timely interventions can prevent disease progression, improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality.
trial registrationThis case report does not involve a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.