ArticleBMC medical education2026
A qualitative study on the development of socially responsive nurses: a conceptual model based on faculty members and student perspectives.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the approaches that has attracted the attention of planners in recent years in order to create a link between the learning of university graduates and the needs of society is the responsive education approach. It is clear that social accountability is not a spontaneous process; there is a need for planned education of students during their academic years and their active participation in social accountability programs. This qualitative study to aimed identify the barriers and facilitators affecting nursing students participation in social accountability programs and to develop a conceptual model for developing socially responsive nurse.
methodsThe present study was a qualitative study with an exploratory inductive content analysis approach. The participants in this study included nursing faculty members and students (N = 15). The sampling method was purposive and continued until data saturation was reached. Data collection and analysis were performed simultaneously. The researcher recorded all interviews using a tape recorder, followed by an immediate verbatim transcription. Subsequently, the text was analyzed using an extractive content analysis method.
resultsAnalysis of interviews with faculty and students led to in the extraction of five core categories of inhibiting factors, which include organizational factors, insufficient positive feedback, barriers related to education and curriculum, and structural and supportive limitations. In addition, seven primary categories of facilitating factors were identified: institutional and legal support, assistance for faculty and students, the development of experiential learning networks, the integration of social accountability into education, individual factors, cultural and social influences, and collaboration with external institutions. The integration of these findings into a holistic conceptual model indicated that bolstering facilitating factors and reducing inhibiting factors can create pathways for the effective engagement of nursing students in social accountability initiatives.
conclusionDeveloping socially responsive nurses requires a systematic and multi-level approach. The proposed model can be used as a roadmap for policymakers and managers to design, plan, and implement socially responsive nursing programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.