ArticleBMC public health2026
The impact of political climate on student health and wellbeing: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe intensifying polarization in the U.S. political climate raises concerns about student mental health. While studies have documented psychological distress among young adults during prior election cycles, student well-being following the political turbulence of the 2024 election has not been well-defined. This study explores how university students perceive and navigate their health and well-being in this context.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative freelisting study of currently enrolled undergraduate and graduate students at the University of Pennsylvania between June and July 2025. Participants were recruited by convenience sampling at high-traffic campus locations and completed freelisting questions on attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions related to health and well-being. Responses were cleaned through iterative coding and grouped into thematic categories. The Smith Salience Index (S) was calculated using the AnthroTools R package to identify the most salient responses. (24) Subgroup analyses were performed by sex, student level, race and ethnicity, and international-student status.
resultsSeventy-three students participated (median age 25 [20-31]; 64% female; 40% Asian; 33% White; 21% international). The most salient emotions regarding the political climate were uncertainty or instability (S = 0.14) and anxiety or concern (S = 0.13). Top physical health practices included exercise (S = 0.55) and diet management (S = 0.18). For mental health, students emphasized spending time (S = 0.16) and talking with (S = 0.16) support systems. Key barriers to health were workload and pressure (S = 0.23), stress (S = 0.12), and financial strain (S = 0.11). Facilitators included strong support systems (S = 0.35) and access to wellness resources (S = 0.12). Students recommended that universities expand mental health resources (S = 0.21), improve transparency (S = 0.12), and enhance food accessibility (S = 0.09).
conclusionsStudents reported high levels of uncertainty, anxiety, and stress amid political instability and relied on social connections and health-promoting behaviors to sustain well-being. Institutional strategies that enhance transparent communication, strengthen social connectedness, and expand access to mental health and basic needs resources may mitigate sociopolitical stressors affecting student health during turbulent times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.