ArticleBMC oral health2026
Association between prosthetic rehabilitation type, nutritional status, and oral health-related quality of life in completely edentulous adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEdentulism negatively affects masticatory function, nutritional status, and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). This study aimed to evaluate the association between prosthetic rehabilitation type, nutritional status, and OHRQoL in completely edentulous patients.
methodsA total of 140 completely edentulous patients were included in this cross-sectional study and divided into three groups: conventional complete dentures (CD), implant-supported overdentures (IOD), and implant-supported fixed prostheses (IFP). OHRQoL was assessed using OHIP-14 and OHQoL-UK, while nutritional status was evaluated using the MNA-SF. Statistical analyses were performed to compare groups and assess correlations.
resultsPatients with implant-supported fixed prostheses demonstrated significantly more favorable OHRQoL and MNA-SF scores compared with conventional denture users (p < 0.05). Significant associations were observed between oral health-related quality of life measures and nutritional status.
conclusionsImplant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation was significantly associated with more favorable oral health-related quality of life outcomes, while differences in nutritional status were also observed among prosthetic rehabilitation groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.