SynthesisJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
EEG biomarkers for assessment, prognosis, and monitoring of natural upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersistent upper limb deficits after stroke necessitate reliable candidate biomarkers to support precision rehabilitation. While electroencephalogram (EEG) provides a highly accessible tool to characterize post-stroke neurophysiology, its clinical translation is hindered by fragmented evidence. This systematical review critically synthesizes the directional associations between EEG biomarkers and upper limb outcomes, and introduces a novel functional framework to classify these biomarkers into assessment, prognostic, and monitoring roles for natural upper limb recovery under conventional rehabilitation.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore up to March 10, 2026. Studies investigating associations between quantitative EEG measures and upper limb motor outcomes in stroke adults were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed risk of bias. Data extraction classified EEG biomarkers by assessment, prognosis, and monitoring roles.
resultsForty-two studies were included, comprising 23 cross-sectional and 19 longitudinal designs. We categorized the evidence into three biomarker roles: (i) assessment, where measures like the brain symmetry index (BSI), β-band interhemispheric connectivity, and network efficiency correlated with impairment severity; (ii) prognostic, where baseline asymmetry and functional connectivity showed predictive potential; and (iii) monitoring, where longitudinal changes in oscillatory power, connectivity, and network topology paralleled functional gains. Across roles, the BSI emerged as one of the most frequently reported candidate metrics.
conclusionEEG-derived metrics, particularly the BSI, serve as frequently reported candidate biomarkers for potential clinical application in stroke rehabilitation. However, their immediate clinical translation is currently limited by the predominantly fair methodological quality of the underlying evidence. Our proposed framework helps to bridge the gap between current observational findings and future clinical utility. Future progress hinges on standardizing protocols and validating these biomarkers in large-scale rehabilitation trials to facilitate their transition toward potentially clinically useful tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.