ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Family traditions, accessibility and cost shape the continued reliance on Cajanus cajan and Azadirachta indica for malaria and typhoid despite prescription medicines in urban and rural Nsukka, Nigeria.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the availability of conventional drugs, the use of medicinal plants for typhoid and malaria remains widespread in Nigeria. This study investigated the indigenous use of Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea) and Azadirachta indica (neem) in rural and urban Nsukka. We assessed: (i) socio-demographic factors influencing knowledge and use; (ii) the association between treatment practices and perceived efficacy; and (iii) socio-economic drivers of continued reliance on these herbal remedies. A cross-sectional survey of 400 respondents selected via stratified random sampling (200 urban, 200 rural) was conducted using structured questionnaires, where the primary outcome of this study was current herbal use, while knowledge was treated as a secondary outcome. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models (GLMs) and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) in R Statistical Software (version 4.3.0). Results indicated that rural residents relied more on herbal remedies due to accessibility, affordability, and family traditions, while urban respondents, despite higher education levels, also used herbal extracts and often alternated them with prescription drugs. Residence, occupation, and age were significant predictors of knowledge and use (P < 0.05), whereas education was not. Nonetheless, perceived efficacy and high prescription costs further sustained herbal use. While these findings highlight socio-cultural and economic factors sustaining herbal medicine use, they also support the need for public health education and integration of evidence-based traditional practices into primary healthcare to ensure safer use. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference. Future studies should combine questionnaire-based surveys with laboratory-based assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.