Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237247›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

Outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: do we treat patients or lesions?

Metin Figen, Meltem Kirli Bolukbas, Gulsen Pinar Soydemir, Esengul Kocak Uzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Metin FigenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey. metinfigen@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-1119
Meltem Kirli BolukbasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4008-4187
Gulsen Pinar SoydemirDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7758-8760
Esengul Kocak UzelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences University Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Saglam Street, Bakirkoy, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-6805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) is increasingly preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with limited brain metastases, aiming to balance durable local control with neurocognitive preservation, and it can be applied both to intact tumors and in the postoperative period. The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and dosimetric outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with brain metastases, treated either in the intact tumor setting or postoperatively.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed a total of 70 lesions in 58 consecutive adults (KPS ≥ 70) treated with linear accelerator-based (LINAC-based) image-guided HFSRT between January 2021 and August 2024 for either intact metastases (i-HFSRT) or postoperative resection cavities (r-HFSRT). Standard prescriptions were 30 Gy/5 fractions (alternate-day delivery); 25 Gy/5 fractions was used at physician's discretion (large volume, prior WBRT, proximity to organs at risk). For the evaluation of overall survival, patients were stratified according to extracranial disease status (present vs. absent), timing of brain metastases presentation, and receipt of systemic therapies with central nervous system penetration (yes vs. no). Outcomes included local control (LC), distant brain progression (DBP), leptomeningeal disease (LMD), radiation necrosis (RN), and overall survival (OS). The volumes of brain parenchyma receiving 24 Gy (V24 Gy) and 30 Gy (V30 Gy) were evaluated.

resultsFifty-eight patients were included (median age 55; 55.2% male); 40 lesions (57.1%) received i-HFSRT and 30 (42.9%) r-HFSRT. Lung (50%) and breast (24%) cancer were the most common primaries. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 4-38). Overall survival was significantly prolonged in patients who received systemic therapies with central nervous system penetration compared to those who did not. Local failure occurred in 4 lesions (5.7%) 2 in i-HFSRT group, 2 in r-HFSRT group. DBP occurred in 23 (39.7%) patients 12 in i-HFSRT group, 11 in r-HFSRT group. LMD developed in 3 patients (5.2%), all in the r-HFSRT cohort at a median of 7 months. RN occurred in 5 lesions (7.1%): 4 i-HFSRT, 1 r-HFSRT. None of these outcomes differed significantly between groups. Median OS was 18 months (95% CI, 9.6-26.4). Despite statistically significant larger GTV/PTV volumes and higher V24/V30 in r-HFSRT, RN did not increase versus i-HFSRT.

conclusionsFive-fraction LINAC-based HFSRT (25-30 Gy) was effective in both groups, with necrosis more frequent in the intact group and leptomeningeal dissemination confined to the operated group, though not statistically significant, emphasizing that, in this patient population with limited overall survival, surgery should be reserved for appropriately selected patients to avoid treatment-related time toxicity.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBrain metastasesHypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapyLeptomeningeal diseaseRadiation necrosisRadiosurgeryTime toxicity

Identifiers

PMID42237247
PMCPMC13455486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.