Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237230›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2026

Role of sarcopenia, obesity and sarcopenic obesity in frailty, frailty transitions and death.

Alejandro Álvarez-Bustos, Jose A Carnicero, Walter Sepúlveda-Loyola, Francisco J Garcia-Garcia, Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alejandro Álvarez-BustosCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.
Jose A CarniceroCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España. lobouc3m@hotmail.com.
Walter Sepúlveda-LoyolaFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Universidad de Las Americas, Santiago, Chile.
Francisco J Garcia-GarciaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.
Leocadio Rodríguez-MañasCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe role of sarcopenic obesity in the transitions of frailty has been largely neglected. The aim of this study is to assess the role of sarcopenic obesity with prevalent frailty, frailty transitions and mortality.

methodsThis is a cohort-based retrospective study including 1538 (74.73 years, 45.51% men) community-dwelling ≥ 65 years. Frailty status (baseline and at follow-up) was evaluated with the Frailty Phenotype (FP) and the Frailty Trait Scale-5 (FTS5). Sarcopenic obesity (SO) status was defined by Body Mass Index ≥ 30 and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health criteria, standardized to our population. Logistic/multilevel/Poisson regression models were used to assess the role of categories according to the presence of sarcopenia and obesity [Non-sarcopenic, non-obese (NS-NO); Non-sarcopenic, obese (NS-O); Sarcopenic, non-obese (S-NO); Sarcopenic obese (SO)] on frailty, frailty transitions (median follow-up 2.99 years). Mortality (median follow-up 6.29 years) was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsCross-sectionally, NS-O, S-NO and SO were significantly associated with frailty across FP and FTS5, compared with the NS-NO category. Longitudinally, S-O was significantly associated with increased rates of frailty progression according to the FP [IRR (95% CI) 1.67 (1.05, 2.68) in robust; 3.35 (1.15, 9.71) in prefrail] and FTS5 [IRR (95% CI): 6.56 (3.68, 11.68)], and reduced the probability of reversing prefrailty status [FP IRR (95% CI): 0.63 (0.41, 0.98)]. S-NO [FP robust, IRR (95% CI) 1.87 (1.17, 2.98); FTS5 non-frail IRR 2.80 (1.46, 5.37)] and NS-O [FTS5 non-frail IRR (95% CI) 2.26 (1.25, 4.09)] also exhibited higher rates of frailty worsening. When sarcopenic obesity was used as the reference category, NS-NO showed a significantly lower incidence of frailty worsening [FP robust IRR 0.60 (0.37, 0.96); FP prefrail IRR 0.30 (0.10, 0.87)], while according to the FTS5, all non-S-O phenotypes were associated with a lower risk of frailty progression, with the strongest associations observed for NS-NO [IRR 0.15 (0.09, 0.27)]. In addition, S-NO and S-O presented a significantly lower likelihood of maintaining robustness or non-frail status across frailty definitions. No category was independently associated with mortality after considering frailty status.

conclusionsSarcopenic obesity is consistently associated with a poor functional evolution in frailty status, but it does not modify the odds of death when frailty status is considered. In addition, it may influence the likelihood of improvement in frailty status among prefrail individuals. Further studies are needed to determine whether obesity provides an additional effect on sarcopenia in shaping frailty transitions.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyObesitySarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMortalityRetrospective StudiesCommunity-dwellingFrailty transitionsMortalitySarcopenic obesity

Identifiers

PMID42237230
PMCPMC13459406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.