Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237218›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2026

Interpretable machine learning for cattle breed classification and SNP prioritization.

Farzad Atrian-Afiani, Gábor Mészáros, Johann Sölkner, Patrik Waldmann

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farzad Atrian-AfianiUniversität für Bodenkultur Wien, Vienna, Austria. farzad.atrian-afiani@boku.ac.at.
Gábor MészárosUniversität für Bodenkultur Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Johann SölknerUniversität für Bodenkultur Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Patrik WaldmannResearch Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, 90014, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe conservation of endangered cattle breeds is an important priority for maintaining biodiversity and keeping unique genetic resources. Traditional conservation methods are often not precise enough for accurate classification into closely related breeds. The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning classification model using single nucleotide polymorphisms to improve breed identification and to identify breed discriminating markers.

resultsWe applied a tuned Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) and a Random Forest (RF) classifier to genome-wide SNP data from 6850 individuals representing 11 endangered Austrian cattle breeds. To interpret the model predictions, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values were used. Hyperparameters were tuned within the training sets using five-fold cross-validation. Final models were then evaluated on the independent test sets (20% of the data) across six random seeds, yielding mean classification accuracies of 0.842 for LightGBM and 0.837 for Random Forest. Feature importance analysis identified the top 100 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) contributing most to breed separation. Some SNPs were highly specific for individual breeds, while others reflected broader population genetic structures. In particular, ARS-BFGL-NGS-97995 distinguished major breed clusters, whereas DIAS-308, ARS-BFGL-NGS-843, and ARS-BFGL-NGS-3513 were highly breed-specific for Fleckvieh, Brown Swiss, and Original Braunvieh, respectively.

conclusionsThe machine learning methods provide scalable tools for accurate breed prediction based on genomic data, and the identified SNPs provide practical markers that can support breed management, monitoring programs, and policy strategies. Hence, by combining efficient classification with interpretable feature analysis, our study offers a useful framework for genomic conservation.

Indexed as

BreedingMachine LearningPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCattleClassification AlgorithmsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom Forest

Identifiers

PMID42237218
PMCPMC13455276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.