Trial reportOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Mesenchymal stromal cell infusions of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells in children with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (MissionEB): a qualitative sub study of a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover, phase 3 trial.
Trial report in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (RDEB) is a rare genetic skin condition causing fragile skin, blistering, and scarring. It leads to chronic pain, slow wound healing, and severe limitations, profoundly impacting patient and family quality of life. Umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSC) have shown therapeutic promise. The Mission EB trial (ISRCTN14409785; registration date 25/03/2021) assessed UC-MSC safety and effectiveness in children with RDEB in a placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover study.
methodsThis study used a qualitative research design with semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, to explore Mission EB trial treatment impact on the quality of life of patients and parents. Parents and patients were interviewed at two time points (approximately 3- and 12-months post-randomisation). Purposive sampling included 10 parents and 6 children; 13 individuals (8 adults, 5 children) were interviewed twice (once in each study period). Interviews were transcribed verbatim, independently coded, with overall impressions agreed upon prior to unblinding.
resultsRDEB significantly impacted daily life, marked by pain and itch. Participants were hopeful of the trial, willing to pursue minor improvements. UC-MSC infusions led to reduced pain/itchiness, improved wound healing, and resulted in fewer self-reported dressing changes. These benefits often translated to increased energy, improved eating, and greater daily activity participation. Benefits were more pronounced with active treatment. Negative effects were minimal, primarily venous access difficulties. Blinded participants could discern active UC-MSC from placebo based on symptom changes; 10 of 13 showed clear differences aligning with treatment. All parents interviewed expressed willingness for their child to receive treatment again.
conclusionsThis qualitative research provides valuable insights into perceived benefits of UC-MSC treatment for children with RDEB. Interview findings regarding symptom improvement and participants' ability to discern active treatment shed light on its perceived benefit in RDEB, especially in milder RDEB patients. The study highlights the critical importance of qualitative methodologies in adding to quantitative trial outcomes and capturing the meaningful impact of interventions on the lives of patients and families particularly where quantitative measures may not fully reflect lived experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.