ArticleDiscover oncology2026
A novel ensemble-based genetic algorithm for enhanced feature selection in lung and pancreatic cancer diagnosis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A major challenge encountered in high dimensional cancer datasets is the presence of irrelevant or redundant features, which can decrease the performance of the classifier model. An efficient feature selection technique is required in order to develop accurate and clinically relevant models for prediction or early detection of cancers. So, in order to enhance feature selection and improve diagnostic accuracy, especially in cancer datasets, this study introduces a novel framework, i.e., Best Cost Genetic Algorithm with Ensemble Crossover Operation (BCGA-ECO). The BCGA-ECO framework integrates three complementary crossover techniques, i.e., Single Point Crossover (SPC), Double Point Crossover (DPC), and Uniform Arithmetic Crossover (UAC), and evaluates chromosomes based on a composite objective function combining mean squared error (MSE) and feature compactness. Experiments were conducted using three datasets: the UCI Lung Cancer dataset containing 32 samples with 56 features, the GEO pancreatic gene expression dataset (GDS4100) containing 24 samples with 76 features, and a clinical pancreatic tumor dataset comprising 74 patient records with 20 clinical features. The performance was assessed using accuracy, RMSE, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. Comparative benchmarks included BestFit, GANN, ReliefF, LASSO, mRMR, etc. BCGA-ECO has shown better performance on these datasets. For the lung cancer dataset (from UCI Repository), BCGA-ECO achieved 93.5% accuracy with an RMSE of 0.209. Therefore, BCGA-ECO outperformed individual crossover methods and feature selectors. For the pancreatic dataset (GDS4100), BCGA-ECO achieved 95.6% accuracy with an RMSE of 0.182. This method helped improve convergence, feature diversity, and robustness. The improvements were consistent across datasets. Additionally, a clinical dataset from pancreatic tumor patients was used to predict post-surgical patient survival. The proposed BCGA-ECO achieved improved efficiency (MSE = 0.079) compared with the traditional GA-NN model (MSE = 0.087), further demonstrating its robustness for moderate- to high-dimensional clinical datasets (typically tens to a few hundred features), achieving AUC-ROC values of 0.962 for lung cancer and 0.974 for pancreatic cancer datasets. Also, ablation studies verified that BCGA-ECO outperformed its single crossover counterparts (SPC, DPC, and UAC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.