Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42237045›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Biomechanical differences between occipital plate and modified C1 lateral mass screw in the treatment of complex craniocervical malformations: a finite element analysis.

Chenpeng Dong, Zhiqiang Xu, Xintong Ran, Cao Yang, Xinghuo Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chenpeng DongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhiqiang XuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China.
Xintong RanSchool of medical imaging, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai, China.
Cao YangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xinghuo WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. wuxinghuo@163.com.

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China NO.82572788the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2024AFD257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex craniocervical malformations pose significant challenges to surgical fixation. The biomechanical advantage of occipital plate fixation versus short-lever modified C1 lateral mass screw fixation remains controversial, and finite element analysis (FEA) is a reliable tool for implant performance evaluation.

objectiveTo compare biomechanical characteristics of occipital plate fixation and modified C1 lateral mass screw fixation in AOZ-BI and AOZ-AAD models via FEA, and guide surgical decision-making.

methodsA validated healthy occipito-atlantoaxial (C0-C2) FEA model was established using CT data. Two pathological models were constructed: AOZ-BI (Group A, atlantoaxial distance [ADI] < 5 mm) and AOZ-AAD (Group B, ADI ≥ 5 mm with transverse ligament dysfunction), each divided into occipital plate and modified C1 lateral mass screw subgroups. Static loads (40 N preload + 1.5 N·m torque) simulated flexion (Fe), extension (Ex), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). C1-C2 range of motion (ROM) and screw-rod peak Von Mises stress (PVMS) were measured.

resultsModified C1 lateral mass screw fixation reduced C1-C2 ROM by 19.67% (flexion-extension) to 48.51% (lateral bending) compared with occipital plate fixation. In flexion/extension/axial rotation, C1 lateral mass screw fixation increased screw-rod peak Von Mises stress (PVMS) by 51.17%-131.37% in the AOZ-BI group and 36.51%-56.02% in the AOZ-AAD group; in lateral bending, PVMS decreased by 19.46% in the AOZ-BI group but increased by 5.24% in the AOZ-AAD group. occipital plate fixation consistently had higher ROM (Group B highest) but lower PVMS.

conclusionsModified C1 lateral mass screw fixation provides superior C1-C2 stability for AOZ-associated BI-AAD but increases implant stress in Fe/Ex/AR. Occipital plate fixation is less stable but reduces stress. Clinically, C1 lateral mass screw is preferred for AOZ-BI; AOZ-AAD requires balancing stability and stress risk. Occipital plate suits patients with severe C1 lateral mass hypoplasia. FEA effectively evaluates craniocervical fixation biomechanics.

Indexed as

Atlanto-Occipital SynostosisBiomechanicsC1 lateral mass screwCraniocervical malformationFinite element analysisOccipital plate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.