ReviewDiscover oncology2026
Investigating the effects of olanzapine on appetite and weight in patients with cancer in a systematic review.
Review in Discover oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnorexia, malnutrition, and cachexia are common in patients with cancer, yet evidence-based pharmacological guidance remains limited. Olanzapine is an antipsychotic that can increase appetite and cause weight gain. This systematic review evaluated the effects of olanzapine on appetite and body weight in patients with cancer.
methodsThis systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing the effects of olanzapine on appetite and/or body weight in patients with cancer. The search strategy was conducted in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB2 for RCTs and the ROBINS-I for observational studies.
resultsOf 1,733 records identified, 79 reports underwent full-text review. Fourteen RCTs, one prospective observational study, and three retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were not designed primarily to evaluate olanzapine as an orexigenic intervention; instead, olanzapine was typically studied for other indications (e.g. chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting control), with appetite and/or weight reported as secondary outcomes. Weight gain with olanzapine was reported in two RCTs using 2.5-5 mg/day for 8-12 weeks in adults. Increased appetite was reported in 10 of 14 studies in which olanzapine (2.5-10 mg/day) was administered for 3 days to 12 weeks. However, only three studies prospectively assessed appetite as a primary outcome, and only two prespecified body weight change as an endpoint, indicating that most evidence derives from secondary analyses. Most RCTs raised some concerns or were at high risk of bias, and observational studies generally had serious or critical risk of bias for outcomes of interest. Only 2 RCTs were judged to be at low risk of bias, underscoring substantial methodological limitations and heterogeneity in populations, indications, dosing regimens, and outcome definitions.
conclusionsAvailable evidence suggests that olanzapine may have orexigenic effects in patients with cancer, with increased appetite reported in several studies and body weight gain observed with long-term use. These findings should be interpreted cautiously given the heterogeneity in study designs and the generally limited methodological quality of the evidence. Further research is needed to confirm these effects and to define the optimal dose and treatment duration for improving appetite and body weight in patients with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.