ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2026
Compressing neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship training: a critical appraisal of the American Board of Pediatrics proposed 2-year pathway.
Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The future of the pediatric research workforce: implications of an evolving fellowship training landscape.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Perspectives of the Association of Academic Neonatology Division Directors on the American Board of Pediatrics recommendations for training in neonatal-perinatal medicine.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) has proposed a competency-based fellowship model offering a 2-year clinical pathway with 18 training blocks and no scholarly requirement. This position statement, representing neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) training program directors, division leaders, and key stakeholders, contends that the model is not viable for NPM training. Compressing 18 clinical blocks into 24 months would require approximately 3500 annual training hours, nearly double a sustainable NICU workload, approaching Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour limits, while reducing didactic education by one-third. Survey data from 110 of 111 NPM programs show 76% opposition. Concerns include trainee wellness, reduction in program complement, workforce and funding implications, and the erosion of scholarly training essential to advancing neonatal care. We propose alternatives, including a 2-year residency + 3-year fellowship (2 + 3) pathway and restructured residency tracks, addressing competency gaps while preserving training quality, duration, and collaborative governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.