ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026
MRI end-points for clinical trials in ataxias: recommendations from the Ataxia Global Initiative MRI Biomarkers Working Group.
Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ataxia Global Initiative recommend MRI end-points for clinical trials in ataxias.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2026Article
- Predicting disease progression in progressive cerebellar ataxias: integrating clinical, imaging, fluid, genetic, and digital biomarkers.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disease-modifying therapies for degenerative ataxias, including emerging gene therapies, are in the clinical trial pipeline. Sensitive outcome measures are urgently needed for treatment monitoring and participant selection to improve trial feasibility in these rare diseases. In hereditary ataxias, the ability to identify people who carry disease-causing mutations before symptom onset also raises the possibility of enrolment into trials before symptom manifestation, but biomarker data are key for participant selection and outcome monitoring in such preventive trials. Quantitative neuroimaging readouts have emerged as viable candidate biomarkers of ataxia pathology and progression that could supplement traditional clinical outcome assessments as clinical trial end-points. In this Consensus Statement, the Ataxia Global Initiative MRI Biomarkers Working Group critically reviews candidate MRI end-points for trials in the most common spinocerebellar ataxias (SCA1, SCA2 and SCA3) and Friedreich ataxia and provides evidence-based, disease-specific recommendations for the selection of MRI end-points for trials in these diseases. Recommendations are also provided for further research to address remaining knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42236987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.