ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and validation of a prediction model of length of ICU stay for benchmarking: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources requires accurate prediction of length of stay (LOS), yet existing LOS models show inconsistent performance across settings and may not generalize to Japanese ICUs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database, including adults admitted to 87 ICUs between April 2022 and March 2023. The primary outcome was ICU LOS in days. Generalized additive models with several distributional assumptions were fitted using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, primary disease category, emergency surgery status, and admission source as predictors. Model performance was evaluated using deviance explained with internal validation. The best-performing model was applied to derive ICU-level standardized length-of-stay ratios (SLOSR) and observed minus expected length of stay (OMELOS), summarized using funnel plots with and without overdispersion correction. Among 65,395 patients, median ICU LOS was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-5). A gamma model with a log link achieved the highest cross-validated deviance explained (0.415). Overdispersion correction reduced the proportion of ICUs exceeding the 95% control limits from 69% to 9.2%. These findings indicate that a gamma-based generalized additive model enables case-mix-adjusted ICU LOS benchmarking and that overdispersion correction substantially affects outlier identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.