Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42236960›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Development and validation of a prediction model of length of ICU stay for benchmarking: a retrospective cohort study.

Hideki Endo, Satoru Hashimoto

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hideki EndoDepartment of Healthcare Quality Assessment, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. hidendo-thk@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0052-0332
Satoru HashimotoICU Collaboration Network, 2-15-13 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient use of intensive care unit (ICU) resources requires accurate prediction of length of stay (LOS), yet existing LOS models show inconsistent performance across settings and may not generalize to Japanese ICUs. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Intensive Care Patient Database, including adults admitted to 87 ICUs between April 2022 and March 2023. The primary outcome was ICU LOS in days. Generalized additive models with several distributional assumptions were fitted using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, primary disease category, emergency surgery status, and admission source as predictors. Model performance was evaluated using deviance explained with internal validation. The best-performing model was applied to derive ICU-level standardized length-of-stay ratios (SLOSR) and observed minus expected length of stay (OMELOS), summarized using funnel plots with and without overdispersion correction. Among 65,395 patients, median ICU LOS was 3 days (interquartile range: 2-5). A gamma model with a log link achieved the highest cross-validated deviance explained (0.415). Overdispersion correction reduced the proportion of ICUs exceeding the 95% control limits from 69% to 9.2%. These findings indicate that a gamma-based generalized additive model enables case-mix-adjusted ICU LOS benchmarking and that overdispersion correction substantially affects outlier identification.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayAgedFemaleHumansJapanRetrospective StudiesBenchmarkingEfficiencyLength of intensive care unit stayPrediction model

Identifiers

PMID42236960
PMCPMC13473596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.