ReviewPediatric research2026
Caring for the smallest hearts: cardiovascular phenotypes and assessment in tiny babies.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With improving survival, periviable neonates (≤25 weeks' gestation) represent a dynamic, but under-studied population in neonatal care, with persistently high cardiopulmonary and vascular vulnerability. Immature cardiovascular structure and function as a consequence of immature myocardial architecture, altered calcium handling, relative adrenal insufficiency, and persistent fetal shunts contribute to complex and dynamic cardiovascular physiology in this population. This may be present clinically in the form of hypotension and low end-organ perfusion. Traditional paradigms of blood pressure-based definitions of hypotension are poorly validated in this population and do not accurately reflect systemic blood flow or end-organ perfusion. Emerging evidence supports a phenotype-based multi-parametric approach to cardiovascular assessment, to distinguish ongoing physiological changes such as ductal physiology, pulmonary hypertension, low systemic vascular resistance and primary myocardial dysfunction phenotypes. However, significant knowledge gaps remain, including lack of normative hemodynamic values, and limited evidence guiding pharmacologic therapies. This narrative review focuses on the cardiovascular challenges in the management of periviable neonates as they transition to extrauterine life, delineating cardiac phenotypes, describing modalities of cardiovascular assessment and identifying existing knowledge gaps. We propose a physiology-based approach to cardiovascular management strategies based on existing, albeit limited, evidence. IMPACT: Periviable neonates present unique hemodynamic challenges due to structural and functional cardiovascular system immaturity, which can be categorized into different hemodynamic phenotypes dictated by baseline cardiac function, lung compliance and directionality of intracardiac shunts, especially the patent ductus arteriosus. In the absence of established normative reference values for common modalities of cardiac assessment, optimal care should consist of early identification of cardiac phenotypes, continuous surveillance, physiology-based management strategies, and frequent reassessment to guide individualized treatment.
Identifiers
42236923What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.